Russell Webster - Work with Offenders
Work with offenders the current trends in violence and patterns of vulnerability among children and young people
A new report published by Crest Advisory on Friday explores the issue of vulnerability as a driver of serious violence, focusing on young people. It summarises the current trends in violence and patterns of vulnerability among children and young people, including the rise in poverty and deprivation.
The report starts by looking at the backgrounds and circumstances of a group of offenders and victims of serious violence to explore vulnerabilities that are thought to be connected to greater risks of violence and draw together common themes.
It then goes on to examine the effectiveness of current approaches to protecting and supporting young people who are at risk of serious violence, and makes recommendations for change.
The recent rise in serious violence in England and Wales has been characterised by a shift towards younger offenders and younger victims. There is evidence that many young people involved in violence are very vulnerable due to their backgrounds and circumstances. Some of these vulnerabilities appear to have been rising for the past five years including levels of poverty and deprivation.
Numbers at risk
Over 213,000 children in England aged 11 to 17 are vulnerable to serious violence due to deprivation and neighbourhood crime. The number of children is unevenly spread across England: nearly 40% live in ten local authority areas. There is growing evidence that Covid and lockdown measures will exacerbate the risks of vulnerability.
Crest analysed a group of perpetrators and a group of victims of violence and found they are not distinct groups. Many violent offenders are also victims - often at the same time. There were high levels of vulnerability among both groups. Details about the young people treated in a London Major Trauma Centre show that experiencing violence, witnessing violence and living in a violent area are by far the most prominent risk factors; many had suffered a traumatic bereavement.
Almost all of the 57 young people in the perpetrator group had previously been victims of violence, either inside or outside the family. Details about the group, provided by a London Youth Offending Team, showed they had serious mental health needs. Many of them were not in education, employment or training - critical protective factors against involvement in violence.
Social network analysis:
Crest conducted a Social Network Analysis of a Youth Offending Team cohort in one London Borough and found that a group of young people linked to a series of violent incidents shared multiple connections. In the criminal justice sphere, such analysis is commonly used to find links between members of organised crime groups. The Crest prototype shows the value of Social Network Analysis for safeguarding teams who need to understand the risk a young person faces outside their family setting in order to develop effective services and interventions. This approach mirrors the now standard mapping undertaken by multi-agency teams tackling County Lines drug dealing (see this recent article by Work with offenders).
The authors of the report found a lack of grip and urgency around those at risk of, and involved in, violence, with many gaps in arrangements to protect them - in particular for victims of violence.
Current safeguarding arrangements are not designed for adolescents at risk of violence outside their home although the new practice of Contextual Safeguarding is seeking to ensure that child protection systems extend to young people at risk of significant harm outside the family setting.
The Crest report found that early help services focus on younger children; and that as caseloads grow, families with older children at risk are not treated as a priority. The authors also point out that childhood trauma can make it hard for people to trust services so they disengage. Many support services, again frequently struggling with workload pressures, tend to focus on managing immediate risks rather than building trust over the longer term.
The report concludes with six key recommendations: